The case would have dealt with whether or not it was constitutional to prohibit a citizen in good standing from ever carrying a gun for self-defense. It would have had sweeping impact across the nation, from gun-prohibited Chicago to California to Texas.
Yet the Supreme Court decided not to hear it. Too tough of an issue, I suppose. I guess now maybe some of you are realizing that you can't depend on the government to tell you whether or not the government can take away your rights.
Supreme Court Justice Views the Docket |
No comments:
Post a Comment