This bill has been in committee since 2009.
Friday, October 14, 2011
Government Surveillance - In Your Car
Posted by
Ernest
A new patent has been filed for combination toll-booth transponders and digital cameras that take a picture of the inside of your vehicle and where you are.
I can't even begin to think of the ways our government would misuse this.
I can't even begin to think of the ways our government would misuse this.
No More Making Fun of the TSA
Posted by
Ernest
HR 3011 will now make it a crime to use the words "TSA", a picture of a TSA agent, their logo, or any likeness that might possibly give the reader/viewer an understanding that you are, in fact, referring TO the TSA. With this, they are effectively trying to outlaw satirization and dissent against the outlaw TSA program that gropes little old ladies and children and on a weekly basis has its agents arrested for kiddie porn or sex-related charges. Check out section 295 if you have doubts. It widely covers ALL Federal agencies, not just the paid molestors at the TSA.
This is from the InfoWars website, who are the ultimate kings of hyperbole, but upon reading the bill ... it DOES actually leave it up to the prosecutors. It's bad law and it heavily infringes upon the 1st Amendment. We already HAVE laws against impersonating a government official ... this law seems to have no other purpose than to provide a future placeholder for criminalizing dissent.
Which jackass is responsible for this? Rep. Michael Rogers, Alabama Republican. It's co-sponsored by 5 other Republicans. I'd like to know who exactly inserted that amendment into the damn thing that will modify the US code of law.
I called his office for some info and the nice girl who answered the phone said they were being deluged with calls right now, thanks to Drudge. She transferred me to the voicemail of the press secretary who is apparently in a staff meeting. We'll see if I get a call back. Hopefully the Bunker Index is prestigious enough to warrant a return call!
This is from the InfoWars website, who are the ultimate kings of hyperbole, but upon reading the bill ... it DOES actually leave it up to the prosecutors. It's bad law and it heavily infringes upon the 1st Amendment. We already HAVE laws against impersonating a government official ... this law seems to have no other purpose than to provide a future placeholder for criminalizing dissent.
Which jackass is responsible for this? Rep. Michael Rogers, Alabama Republican. It's co-sponsored by 5 other Republicans. I'd like to know who exactly inserted that amendment into the damn thing that will modify the US code of law.
I called his office for some info and the nice girl who answered the phone said they were being deluged with calls right now, thanks to Drudge. She transferred me to the voicemail of the press secretary who is apparently in a staff meeting. We'll see if I get a call back. Hopefully the Bunker Index is prestigious enough to warrant a return call!
War in Uganda
Posted by
Ernest
So now Obama is sending troops to Uganda? They will supposedly be in an advisory role, but when the local boys turn out not to be capable of the mission then it always seems like it's Americans who have to do the fighting, and the dying.
The Lord's Resistance Army is a bunch of nutjobs and bad actors, alright. Those are the guys who got pushed back into the Congo and resorted to catching and eating the indigenous pygmy tribes. Even when out in civilization they've been pretty nasty ... raping and pillaging across three different African countries.
The question is not whether or not the LRA are bad people ... they are. The question is, what threat do they pose to Americans? What national interest do we have sending a SINGLE soldier into that country in order to help them deal with what is effectively their problem? They've been fighting out there since 1987. This is an African problem, not an American one.
Unless of course Obama really just wants to find their leader and have him brought to America to serve in a cabinet position. Future Attorney General after Eric Holder resigns, perhaps?
The Lord's Resistance Army is a bunch of nutjobs and bad actors, alright. Those are the guys who got pushed back into the Congo and resorted to catching and eating the indigenous pygmy tribes. Even when out in civilization they've been pretty nasty ... raping and pillaging across three different African countries.
The question is not whether or not the LRA are bad people ... they are. The question is, what threat do they pose to Americans? What national interest do we have sending a SINGLE soldier into that country in order to help them deal with what is effectively their problem? They've been fighting out there since 1987. This is an African problem, not an American one.
Unless of course Obama really just wants to find their leader and have him brought to America to serve in a cabinet position. Future Attorney General after Eric Holder resigns, perhaps?
The Top 1% Everyone Hates
Posted by
Ernest
The protestors of the OWS movement are protesting the fact that 1% of the population owns all of the world's wealth.
Who exactly are the top 1%? George Soros? Bill Gates?Steve Jobs? Dick Cheney?
I invite you to enter your annual salary into this calculator. You'll be surprised.
If your household makes more than $48,000 per year then you're in the top 1%.
Who exactly are the top 1%? George Soros? Bill Gates?
I invite you to enter your annual salary into this calculator. You'll be surprised.
If your household makes more than $48,000 per year then you're in the top 1%.
US Army Fusion Center
Posted by
Ernest
| Continent | : | North America |
| Country | : | United States |
| State | : | Ohio |
| City | : | Mason |
| Lat/Long | : | 39.3522, -84.2994 (Map) |
Is this a visitor from the interagency fusion center for domestic terrorism checking up on me or simply a fan who is "on the inside"?
Either way, I'd love to hear from you at bunkerindex@hushmail.com and answer any questions you might have.
CROSSPOSTED: What Will You Do?
Posted by
Ernest
So many people have already forgotten how the "Arab Spring" went down.
The Muslim Brotherhood started it. Through skillful propaganda manueverings, they filled up the streets with a huge number of supporters who not only weren't part of the Muslim Brotherhood but also didn't even LIKE the Muslim Brotherhood. They simply wanted democracy.
What happened as soon as the government fell? The Muslim Brotherhood pushed out all the other factions (in some cases with violence) and took over. They were the only ones in place and ready because they had staged it all from the beginning.
The OWS movement started as a communist movement. There is a hardcore element of communists there still organizing and providing logistical support. Yes, there are hundreds of other people elsewhere protesting who aren't communists and who don't even LIKE the communists, but this IS a communist-led movement. If it plays out to its conclusion, the communists are going to attempt to seize control when the mayhem is sorted out and the blood in the streets is hosed into the gutter. Where will all of us libertarians, Christians, Tea Party Conservatives, and liberty-minded free-thinkers find ourself when the communists move in to seize control in the void they have created?
To the question of whether or not violence will be needed, of COURSE it will be needed. Why would any reasonably educated human being think otherwise? The bankers and corrupt politicians are snug in their beds each night while the protestors sleep on cold concrete and wait for the New York winter to give them frostbite and pneumonia. Half of America is watching on television and cheering for the jackboots to "hit 'em again!" Political systems don't change just by thinking happy thoughts. Not here in the real world.
The movement has gained traction and won't be stopped. When Bloomberg's thugs-in-uniform move in and start cracking skulls then it will simply provoke a causus belli amongst Americans that will give the communist-led movement the steam it needs to affect real change.
The question is ... what are YOU going to do when it's over? You're the kulaks that the communists despise. Right now they've got the 1% to deal with, but they'll continue to slice and dice this wealth issue until YOU'RE the one in their crosshairs. Eventually a mob will form outside YOUR door and demand that you give up some of your dried beans because THEIR children are hungry. What will you do then?
The Muslim Brotherhood started it. Through skillful propaganda manueverings, they filled up the streets with a huge number of supporters who not only weren't part of the Muslim Brotherhood but also didn't even LIKE the Muslim Brotherhood. They simply wanted democracy.
What happened as soon as the government fell? The Muslim Brotherhood pushed out all the other factions (in some cases with violence) and took over. They were the only ones in place and ready because they had staged it all from the beginning.
The OWS movement started as a communist movement. There is a hardcore element of communists there still organizing and providing logistical support. Yes, there are hundreds of other people elsewhere protesting who aren't communists and who don't even LIKE the communists, but this IS a communist-led movement. If it plays out to its conclusion, the communists are going to attempt to seize control when the mayhem is sorted out and the blood in the streets is hosed into the gutter. Where will all of us libertarians, Christians, Tea Party Conservatives, and liberty-minded free-thinkers find ourself when the communists move in to seize control in the void they have created?
To the question of whether or not violence will be needed, of COURSE it will be needed. Why would any reasonably educated human being think otherwise? The bankers and corrupt politicians are snug in their beds each night while the protestors sleep on cold concrete and wait for the New York winter to give them frostbite and pneumonia. Half of America is watching on television and cheering for the jackboots to "hit 'em again!" Political systems don't change just by thinking happy thoughts. Not here in the real world.
The movement has gained traction and won't be stopped. When Bloomberg's thugs-in-uniform move in and start cracking skulls then it will simply provoke a causus belli amongst Americans that will give the communist-led movement the steam it needs to affect real change.
The question is ... what are YOU going to do when it's over? You're the kulaks that the communists despise. Right now they've got the 1% to deal with, but they'll continue to slice and dice this wealth issue until YOU'RE the one in their crosshairs. Eventually a mob will form outside YOUR door and demand that you give up some of your dried beans because THEIR children are hungry. What will you do then?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
